Para quem está habituado aos chavões da versão empobrecida do marxismo vulgar ainda em voga em Perdizes, a leitura de autores como; Jonathan Wolff, Geuss,Leiter, MacIntyre,que mantem um dialogo com está tradição( ou a ela se filiam) apenas confirma a impressão que os maiores inimigos do marxismo, nas bandas de Perdizes, são os próprios marxistas. Uma boa amostra é a resenha, escrita pelo Adam Kirsch, do livro mais recente do Geuss, que publicamos, parciamente, a seguir:
"The Roar of Justice
Philosopher Raymond Geuss, an idealist in realist’s clothing
17 October 2008
Philosophy and Real Politics, by Raymond Geuss (Princeton, 126 pp., $19.95)
In the first book of Plato’s Republic, Socrates’s measured discussion of the nature of justice is rudely interrupted by a “roar” from Thrasymachus. “He could no longer hold his peace,” Socrates recalls, “and, gathering himself up, he came at us like a wild beast, seeking to devour us. We were quite panic-stricken at the sight of him.” What makes Thrasymachus so angry is the idealistic notion of justice that Socrates tries to defend. The philosopher argues that “justice is the proper virtue of man,” but Thrasymachus demands that he give up such woolly abstractions: “I will not have you say that justice is duty or advantage or profit or gain or interest, for this sort of nonsense will not do for me; I must have clearness and accuracy.” When one looks at justice clearly, Thrasymachus insists, he finds that it’s nothing but the disguise worn by power: “I proclaim that justice is nothing else than the interest of the stronger.”
Raymond Geuss, a political philosopher who teaches at the University of Cambridge, does not seem like the kind of man who would try to devour his opponents. But his intention in Philosophy and Real Politics, his short, sharp new book, is the same as Thrasymachus’s: to introduce a note of realism into contemporary philosophical debates about justice, by force if necessary. “I object to the claim that politics is applied ethics,” he writes in his introduction. Rather than starting out, like Socrates, with questions about the good or the just, we should ask the question famously posed by Lenin: “Who whom?” That is, in any actual society, who has power, what do they use it for, and who suffers as a result? “To think politically,” writes Geuss, “is to think about agency, power, and interests, and the relations among these.”
Para ler a resenha completa clique aqui.
